UK case law

Pure Vision Eye Care Limited v The Pensions Regulator

[2025] UKFTT GRC 1419 · First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Pensions · 2025

Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Full judgment

17. The Tribunal confirms the Escalating Penalty Notice.

18. The appeal is dismissed. The penalty of £2,000 stands.

19. No directions are necessary. Reasons

20. Compliance with re-declaration duties is central to the automatic enrolment regime.

21. The Appellant had multiple reminders and opportunities to comply.

22. Statutory presumptions of service apply and were not rebutted.

23. No reasonable excuse has been established.

24. The penalty is proportionate and mandated by legislation. Right to Apply for Costs

25. Any application for costs must be made under Rule 10 of the Tribunal Procedure (GRC) Rules 2009 within 28 days. Judge Brian Kennedy KC Date: 25 November 2025.

Pure Vision Eye Care Limited v The Pensions Regulator [2025] UKFTT GRC 1419 — UK case law · My AI Group